AMC1 SERA.6001 Classification of airspaces - ED Decision
2013/013/R
GENERAL
Where ATS airspaces adjoin vertically, i.e. one above the other, flights at a common level
should comply with the requirements of, and be given services applicable to, the less
restrictive class of airspace.
GM1 SERA.6001 Classification of airspaces - ED Decision 2013/013/R
GENERAL
- Class B airspace is considered less restrictive than Class A airspace; Class C airspace
less restrictive than Class B airspace, etc.
- The speed limitation of 250 kt for VFR flights in airspace Classes C, D, E, F, G and for
IFR flights in airspace Classes D, E, F, G is intended to facilitate visual acquisition
of flights which are not separated.
- Wherever there is a need to accommodate within a given airspace class operations
compatible with a less restrictive class, the following may be used:
- reclassification of the airspace concerned;
- redesigning the volume of airspace concerned by defining airspace restrictions
or reservations, or subvolumes of less restrictive classes of airspace (e.g.
corridors).
AMC1 SERA.6001(a)(4);(5);(6);(7) Classification of airspaces - ED
Decision 2013/013/R
SPEED LIMITATION — SAFETY ASSESSMENT AND APPROVAL BY THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY
Approval by the competent authority of an alleviation of the 250 kt speed limitation below 3
050 m (10 000 ft) should be based on a safety assessment. The conditions for granting such
alleviation should be specified in the Member State Aeronautical Information Publication
(AIP).
GM1 SERA.6001(a)(4);(5);(6);(7) Classification of airspaces - ED Decision
2013/013/R
SPEED LIMITATION — SAFETY ASSESSMENT AND APPROVAL BY THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY
- The following should, as a minimum, be considered when developing the safety assessment:
- air traffic, airspace classes requirements, and airspace design, the procedures
designed for the airspace, and the potential use of clearances to maintain own
separation as described in GM1 to SERA.8005(b);
- the minimum safe speed stated in the approved Aircraft Flight Manual (AFM) of
the relevant aircraft types.
- The safety assessment should be developed in coordination with the relevant airspace
users.
- Coordination should be ensured with the affected airspace users who should provide the
data necessary for the development of the safety assessment.
- The competent authority should ensure that the aircraft types eligible for such
alleviation are specified in the Member State Aeronautical Information Publication.
GM2 SERA.6001(a)(4);(5);(6);(7) Classification of airspaces - ED Decision
2013/013/R
SPEED LIMITATION — SAFETY ASSESSMENT AND APPROVAL BY THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY
- For localised alleviations from the speed limitation, the safety assessment is normally
conducted by the ATS provider and is subject to approval by the competent authority.
- Where alleviation is applied universally across the airspace of the Member State, the
competent authority should ensure that appropriate safety assessment has been conducted.
AMC1 SERA.6001(a)(6) Classification of airspaces - ED Decision
2024/007/R
OPERATIONS IN CLASS F AIRSPACE
- Aircraft using the air traffic advisory service
IFR flights electing to use or required by the competent authority on the basis of
regional air navigation agreements to use the air traffic advisory service when
operating within Class F airspace should comply with the same procedures as those
applying to controlled flights except that:
- the flight plan and changes thereto are not subjected to a clearance, since the
unit furnishing air traffic advisory service will only provide advice on the
presence of essential traffic or suggestions a possible course of action;
- it is for the aircraft to decide whether or not it will comply with the advice
or suggestion received and to inform the unit providing air traffic advisory
service, without delay, of its decision;
- air–ground contacts should be made with the air traffic services unit designated
to provide air traffic advisory service within the advisory airspace or portion
thereof.
- Aircraft not using the air traffic advisory service
- Aircraft wishing to conduct IFR flights within advisory airspace, but not
electing to use the air traffic advisory service, should nevertheless submit a
flight plan, and notify changes made thereto to the unit providing that service.
- IFR flights intending to cross an advisory route should do so as nearly as
possible at an angle of 90 degrees to the direction of the route and at a level,
appropriate to its track, selected from the tables of cruising levels prescribed
for use by IFR flights operating outside controlled airspace.
[applicable from 1 May 2025 – ED Decision 2024/007/R]
GM1 SERA.6001(a)(6) Classification of airspaces - ED Decision
2024/007/R
AIR TRAFFIC ADVISORY SERVICE
The objective of the air traffic advisory service is to make information on
collision hazards more effective than it would be in the mere provision of flight
information service (FIS). It may be provided to aircraft conducting IFR flights in advisory
airspace or on advisory routes (Class F airspace). Such areas or routes will be specified by
the Member State concerned.
[applicable from 1 May 2025 – ED Decision 2024/007/R]
GM2 SERA.6001(a)(6) Classification of airspaces - ED Decision
2024/007/R
FLIGHT PLAN CHANGES IN CLASS F AIRSPACE
It is assumed that a pilot will not effect a change in the current flight
plan until they have notified the intended change to the appropriate air traffic services
unit and, if practicable, have received acknowledgement or relevant advice.
[applicable from 1 May 2025 – ED Decision 2024/007/R]
GM3 SERA.6001(a)(6) Classification of airspaces - ED Decision
2024/007/R
CLEARANCES TO FLIGHTS THAT OPERATE PARTIALLY IN CLASS F
AIRSPACE
TWhen a flight operates or is about to operate in a control area to
continue eventually into an advisory area or along an advisory route, a clearance may be
issued for the whole route, but the clearance as such, or revisions to it, applies only to
those portions of the flight that are conducted within control areas and control zones.
Advice or suggestions will be provided as necessary for the remaining portion(s) of the
route
[applicable from 1 May 2025 – ED Decision 2024/007/R]
AMC1 SERA.6001(a)(8) Classification of airspaces - ED Decision
2013/013/R
GENERAL
Class F airspace should only be implemented where the air traffic services are inadequate for
the provision of air traffic control, and the limited advice on collision hazards otherwise
provided by flight information service will not be adequate. Where air traffic advisory
service is implemented, this should be considered as a temporary measure only until such
time as it can be replaced by air traffic control service or, in cases where the traffic
situation changes such that advisory service is no longer required, replaced by flight
information service.
GM1 SERA.6001(a)(8) Classification of airspaces - ED Decision
2013/013/R
DURATION OF TEMPORARY MEASURE
- When establishing Class F airspace, its intended temporary duration after which it
should be replaced by an alternative classification should be specified in the AIP of
the Member State.
- The intended temporary duration of Class F airspace should not be longer than 3 years.
EXAMPLE
- Certain CTR airspace may change its classification on a daily basis (e.g. from 06:00 to
20:00 the airspace is classified as Class A, and from 20:00 until 23:59 and from 00:00
until 05:59 is classified as Class F). In this case, the duration of these arrangements
should not exceed 3 years.
FRA.6001
Mise en œuvre
- La limitation de la vitesse air indiquée (IAS) à 250 kt en dessous de 3050 mètres
(10 000 pieds) AMSL ne s’applique pas aux aéronefs de la défense qui, pour des
raisons techniques ou liées à la sécurité, ne peuvent maintenir cette vitesse.
- Des opérations aériennes effectuées en dérogation à la limitation de la vitesse air
indiquée (IAS) à 250 noeuds en dessous de 3050 mètres (10 000 pieds) AMSL pour des
missions de travail aérien ou pour des vols acrobatiques sont possibles après
approbation du directeur interrégional de la sécurité de l’aviation civile
territorialement compétent lorsque les aéronefs utilisés ne peuvent, pour des raisons
techniques ou de qualité de vol, maintenir cette vitesse.
Les opérations concernées ne peuvent se dérouler qu’à l’intérieur d’un espace aérien
permettant une ségrégation avec les autres usagers de l’espace aérien ou sur une
localisation d’activité de voltige publiée.
Cette approbation est fondée sur une étude de sécurité. Celle-ci est réalisée par
l’exploitant de l’aéronef et, lorsque les opérations se déroulent à l’intérieur d’un
espace aérien contrôlé, en coordination avec l’organisme de contrôle concerné.